Sunday, May 25, 2025

How SOC 1 & SOC 2 Certifications Drive Stronger Security Posture and Business Growth Across Industries

 



In an increasingly digital-first economy, trust is currency. For organizations that handle sensitive customer data or provide outsourced services, maintaining rigorous security and operational standards is no longer optional—it’s a business imperative. SOC 1 and SOC 2 certifications, developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), have emerged as crucial frameworks not only for enhancing a company’s security posture but also for unlocking new revenue streams, increasing client confidence, and gaining competitive advantage.

What Are SOC 1 and SOC 2 Certifications?

  • SOC 1 focuses on internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR). It is especially relevant for service providers who impact their clients' financial reporting.

  • SOC 2 evaluates how a company manages data based on five trust service criteria: security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

Both certifications are verified through rigorous independent audits, helping organizations demonstrate compliance, transparency, and control maturity.


Industry-Wide Benefits: Security and Revenue Growth

1. SaaS Companies: Shorter Sales Cycles and Greater Customer Trust

A 2023 survey by the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) found that 87% of enterprise buyers prefer working with SaaS vendors that have SOC 2 reports. Having this certification often eliminates the need for repetitive security questionnaires, accelerating procurement processes and increasing conversion rates.

Case in point: Segment, a leading customer data platform, reported that achieving SOC 2 certification cut down their enterprise sales cycles by 25–30%, while also boosting their top-tier client base. (Source: Secureframe)


2. Fintech and Financial Services: Gaining Investor and Client Confidence

For fintech firms, where trust and security are paramount, SOC 1/SOC 2 reports are frequently required by partners, regulators, and investors.

Example: Plaid, a company that connects consumer bank accounts to fintech apps, attributed part of its early-stage growth to having SOC 2 Type II in place, which enabled integrations with tier-1 banks and compliance with their rigorous due diligence processes.

A study by Coalfire and CyberRisk Alliance (2022) revealed that companies with SOC 2 Type II certification are 30% more likely to close deals with financial institutions and Fortune 500 clients.


3. Healthcare: Ensuring HIPAA Compliance with SOC 2

In the healthcare industry, where HIPAA regulations are non-negotiable, SOC 2 compliance provides a complementary assurance framework. It helps healthcare SaaS vendors demonstrate that they are managing PHI responsibly, reducing risk exposure.

Example: Healthtech startup Redox used SOC 2 as a foundational layer to scale HIPAA-compliant integrations across hundreds of healthcare systems, which directly contributed to its revenue growth and Series C funding success. (Source: Vanta)


4. E-commerce and Retail: Reducing Third-Party Risk

As retail and e-commerce ecosystems become more reliant on external service providers for data analytics, payments, and cloud hosting, SOC 2 has become a requirement to assure customers that sensitive transactional data is being managed securely.

Example: A leading e-commerce analytics platform achieved SOC 2 compliance and reported a 40% increase in enterprise partnerships within the first year post-certification. This was largely due to improved trust in data handling and privacy controls.


5. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and BPOs: Staying Competitive

SOC 1 certification is especially critical for BPOs and MSPs that manage critical business operations, such as payroll processing, claims management, or customer service. It proves that controls over financial reporting data are robust and auditable.

Example: ADP, a payroll and HR services leader, leverages its SOC 1 reports to support its credibility with clients’ auditors. This has helped it win large enterprise contracts, including government and Fortune 100 clients.


The Multiplier Effect: Security + Revenue = Strategic Growth

The strategic benefits of SOC certifications extend beyond compliance:

  • Enhanced internal discipline: Organizations adopt standardized processes and better documentation.

  • Incident prevention: Stronger internal controls lead to fewer breaches and data leaks.

  • Investor readiness: VCs and acquirers increasingly view SOC 2 as a benchmark for operational maturity.

  • Cross-border expansion: SOC certifications are recognized globally and often satisfy international regulatory requirements.


Conclusion

SOC 1 and SOC 2 certifications are no longer just about compliance—they're a growth catalyst. Whether you're a fast-scaling startup or an enterprise provider, these reports enable you to enter new markets, reduce risk exposure, and build long-term trust with customers and stakeholders. Investing in these certifications is not just a cost of doing business—it’s a strategic lever for sustainable growth.


Sources

  1. Cloud Security Alliance – State of Cloud Security Survey, 2023

  2. Secureframe – How SOC 2 Helped Segment Scale Sales

  3. Coalfire & CyberRisk Alliance – SOC 2 Impact Study, 2022

  4. Vanta – Redox Case Study on SOC 2 Compliance

  5. AICPA – SOC Reports Guide

  6. ADP Annual Report and Compliance Overview


Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Navigating Vendor Risk Assessments: Best Practices from the Frontlines of TPRM

 


In today’s interconnected business environment, vendors are often an extension of our own organization. As someone who has spent nearly two decades leading information security and risk assurance initiatives, I’ve seen firsthand how a well-executed Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) program can safeguard a company’s data, reputation, and customer trust.

Whether onboarding a new vendor or renewing an existing relationship, risk assessments are critical. However, not all assessments are created equal. Through my journey across regulated industries and global compliance landscapes, I’ve gathered a set of best practices that blend regulatory expectations with practical experience.


1. Start with a Risk-Based Segmentation

One of the early mistakes I used to see — and admittedly made myself early on — was applying a one-size-fits-all risk assessment. This not only wastes resources but also creates fatigue across teams.

Best Practice:
Classify vendors based on their risk profile: Critical, High, Medium, Low. Factors include data access (PII, PHI, PCI), system integration, regulatory exposure, and business impact. Only critical/high-risk vendors should go through extensive due diligence.


2. Align Assessment Depth with Business Impact

While working with a cloud service provider for a sensitive healthcare client, I learned how essential it is to align assessment scope with potential business disruption.

Best Practice:
Use tiered questionnaires and leverage industry frameworks like:

  • ISO/IEC 27001

  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework

  • SIG-Lite / SIG-Core by Shared Assessments

  • CSA CAIQ for cloud vendors
    This ensures proportional effort and deeper focus where it matters most.


3. Involve Cross-Functional Stakeholders Early

A successful TPRM program is not just an InfoSec initiative — it's a collaborative effort.

Best Practice:
Loop in Procurement, Legal, Privacy, and Business Owners right from the risk assessment phase. Their inputs can highlight hidden dependencies, legal exposures, and operational nuances that security alone might overlook.


4. Verify, Don’t Just Trust Artifacts

I’ve come across vendors proudly waving their ISO27001 or SOC 2 Type II reports. While these are valuable, they’re not bulletproof.

Best Practice:

  • Review reports critically. Look for scope, carve-outs, and noted exceptions.

  • If possible, request evidence samples (e.g., redacted policies, screenshots, or audit logs).

  • Conduct interviews or virtual assessments for high-risk vendors, especially if they impact regulated data.


5. Don’t Underestimate Renewal Assessments

One of the biggest gaps I’ve noticed — especially in mature organizations — is the complacency during vendor renewals.

Best Practice:
Treat renewals as a checkpoint, not a rubber stamp. Reassess:

  • Changes in services or integrations

  • Breach history since the last review

  • Compliance with evolving regulations (e.g., DORA, GDPR updates, AI governance)

Pro tip from experience: Maintain a trigger-based reassessment model — any material change in the vendor’s environment should prompt a risk review outside the renewal cycle.


6. Automate Where Possible, but Humanize the Review

I’ve implemented automation through platforms like Archer, OneTrust, and ProcessUnity — and it’s saved countless hours. But, don’t automate judgment.

Best Practice:
Use tools to manage workflows, scoring, and document storage. But retain manual reviews for free-text responses, risk ratings, and red flags. Always involve a risk analyst or SME in final decisions.


7. Document Everything – It’s Your Audit Trail

During an audit for a large banking client, I once had to dig through email chains and chat logs to recreate a vendor decision. Not fun.

Best Practice:
Maintain a central repository for:

  • Completed questionnaires

  • Risk ratings and justification

  • Mitigation plans

  • Approval sign-offs
    This not only simplifies audits but also provides continuity if personnel change.


8. Monitor Post-Onboarding

Risk doesn’t end with onboarding — it evolves.

Best Practice:
Set up ongoing monitoring mechanisms:

  • Cybersecurity rating tools (e.g., BitSight, SecurityScorecard)

  • News and breach alerts

  • Annual reassessments or trigger-based reassessments
    Incorporate these insights into a Vendor Risk Register and regularly update senior stakeholders.


Closing Thoughts

Over the years, I’ve learned that TPRM is as much about relationships and risk culture as it is about checklists. The real value of a risk assessment lies in what you do with it — not just the fact that you did it.

By embedding context, collaboration, and continuous improvement into your risk assessment process, you don’t just check a compliance box — you protect your organization in a tangible, measurable way.


Sources and Frameworks Referenced:

  • ISO/IEC 27001:2022 – Information Security Management

  • NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 – Security and Privacy Controls

  • Shared Assessments SIG – Standardized Information Gathering

  • CSA CAIQ – Cloud Security Alliance’s Consensus Assessment Initiative Questionnaire

  • BitSight, SecurityScorecard – Vendor cyber risk monitoring platforms

  • DORA – Digital Operational Resilience Act (EU, 2025 compliance)

  • Personal experiences across banking, cloud, and healthcare sectors


Sunday, May 4, 2025

Kafka in Cybersecurity: Turning Bugs into Existential Threats

 


Imagine this: You wake up one morning and find yourself transformed into a legacy firewall rule that nobody understands but nobody dares delete. Congratulations—you’re living in a Kafkaesque cybersecurity program.

Welcome to Kafka in Cybersecurity, where we take inspiration from Franz Kafka, the patron saint of absurd bureaucracy, inexplicable decisions, and silent suffering, and explore how his worldview is alarmingly relevant to the infosec world today.


1. The Trial: Why Audit Logs Feel Like Interrogations

In Kafka’s The Trial, Josef K. is arrested for a crime he doesn’t understand, prosecuted by a faceless authority, and never told what he’s guilty of.

Sound familiar?

Welcome to the compliance audit.

You’re pulled into a meeting. “We found a violation,” the auditor says.
You ask, “Of what exactly?”
They respond with a knowing look, a clipboard, and a vague reference to Annex A.12.4.1.

Kafka would’ve called it art. We call it ISO 27001.


2. The Castle: When Access Control Gets Too Real

Kafka’s The Castle is about a man trying to gain access to a mysterious authority that may or may not exist. He’s stuck in an endless loop of permissions, denials, and "please contact the access owner."

Welcome to role-based access control in a global enterprise.

You raise a ticket to get access to a dashboard.
The dashboard needs you to have a different role.
That role requires a training course.
The course link is broken.
The admin left in 2019.

Kafka didn’t write about Active Directory, but he might as well have.


3. Metamorphosis: Becoming a Vulnerability

In The Metamorphosis, Gregor Samsa wakes up as a giant bug. Replace “bug” with “zero-day” and you’ve got every CISO’s worst morning.

You patch. You pray. You issue a press release.
But like Gregor, your reputation is never quite the same.
Kafka in cybersecurity is realizing that transformation isn't evolution—it’s escalation.


4. Kafkaesque Ticketing Systems

Franz Kafka might not have written JIRA, but his spirit lives in it.

  • Ticket opened: Please investigate data leak.

  • Comment from Legal: This needs to go through DPO.

  • Comment from DPO: Escalate to Engineering.

  • Comment from Engineering: Assign to SOC.

  • Comment from SOC: Was this ticket meant for Facilities?

Kafka called it “labyrinthine bureaucracy.” We call it risk acceptance workflow.


5. Surveillance and The Trial of Trust

Kafka’s world was full of invisible watchers and unknown observers. In cybersecurity, this manifests as monitoring, logging, and user behavior analytics.

Everyone’s watched.
No one’s informed.
Even the AI can’t explain what it’s flagging.
Congratulations, your SOC is now Kafka’s The Trial, but automated.


6. Embracing the Absurd: Security Policy Writing

“Passwords must be at least 16 characters, contain uppercase, lowercase, a haiku, and the blood of a virgin.”
“Users must read and acknowledge the Acceptable Use Policy which is 74 pages long and written in legal Old English.”

Kafka would’ve admired the commitment to making the understandable unknowable.


So, What’s the Lesson Here?

In Kafka’s world, meaning is elusive, authority is faceless, and resolution is impossible.
In cybersecurity, that’s called Monday.

But seriously: Kafka reminds us that if we don’t intentionally design clear, human-centric, and rational security practices, we risk building systems that feel like The Castle, enforce like The Trial, and transform users into compliance bugs.

Let’s do better. Let’s fight Kafka with clarity.


📚 Sources of (Existential) Inspiration

  1. Franz Kafka, The Trial

  2. Franz Kafka, The Castle

  3. Franz Kafka, The Metamorphosis

  4. “Kafkaesque: A Word You Should Know” – Merriam-Webster

  5. OWASP Top 10 – because bureaucracy loves vague risk matrices

  6. Your internal audit team's SharePoint site (of course)

  7. Conversations with auditors, access managers, and frustrated SOC analysts


Zen Mindset for a Stoic Information Security Manager

  In an industry shaped by constant change, relentless compliance requirements, and high-stakes incidents, the mental fortitude of an Inform...